rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
rosalarian:AI “art” is not innocuous. It is having real negative impact on the arts. From magazines and book publishers deciding to use AI “art” instead of hiring illustrators, to literary magazines having to close down submissions
